Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sorebearmat/D.J. Richardson

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was history merge. Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Sorebearmat/D.J. Richardson
Relisted. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC) Relisted. Salvio Let's talk about it! 17:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)



Used to be draft space but has been moved to mainspace at D. J. Richardson. Housekeeping. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:56, 26 September 2011 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio  Let's talk about it! 17:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio  Let's talk about it! 21:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

 Is it good enough to move to article space? It looks well written and sourced, but I'm not sure about notability. Buddy431 (talk) 20:16, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * History merge is the ideal fix to the copy-paste move. It is sufficient to just redirect these, with no harm in the user requesting deletion.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:17, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * History merge User:Sorebearmat/D.J. Richardson and D. J. Richardson to resolve the WP:FAKEARTICLE concern. Cunard (talk) 22:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.