Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Spinenspyker/sandbox/Spinenspyker

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Salvio giuliano 23:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

User:Spinenspyker/sandbox/Spinenspyker

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This page is patent nonsense. It is the purported biographical page of an imaginary person, with a list of imaginary qualifications and military awards. BoonDock (talk) 00:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Tagged for Speedy Deletion per WP:U5.  Stuart 98  ( Talk • Contribs) 00:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:U5 more carefully. The user is a contributor, and the page is plausibly an article draft. SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * An article draft for what? There is a very bad movie with the same title as the article, but even if this was supposed to be the page for the titular character, it has no relation whatsoever to that fictional character at all. Exhibit A: Please note that this "character" attended "Starfleet Acad". BoonDock (talk) 14:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * U5 was written with unusual breadth of application because it was coupled to very tight criteria on “non contributor”, and that the page in question does not even look like an attempt to contribute to the project.
 * This page is closer to G3 than U5.
 * Speedy criteria need to be unobjectionable. Let this MfD play out.  Deletion at MfD is a stronger message than speedy deletion. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:20, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, I cannot find a single substantive contribution from this user. Other than this page, there a number of reverted COVID-19 edits and two minor changes that exist on WP in the first 250 edits. BoonDock (talk) 14:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * U5 is really aimed at driveby Resumé dumpers. This user has been here a long time, and a clear consensus, that his efforts are unwelcome, is better that a quiet speedy deletion. SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: While this fanciful citation salad would surely make for an amusing copypasta, it is most certainly not a Wikipedia article and unsuitable for userspace per WP:NOTWEBHOST. silvia  (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)  (inquire within)  07:37, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: as total nonsense, supported by fanciful citations. For instance ref 10 ("McGhee 1989" - the book exists but the author was not named "McGhee") was published when "Kaptein Caprivi" was 16 or 17, by which time he had apparently "design[ed] quality military hardware[9], including jet fighters, troop carriers, guided missiles, IFV's, multiple rocket launchers, and semi-automatic direct fire grenade launchers.[10]" A busy teenager, it seems. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete both as a fake article and as a biographies of living persons violation. Look at the "spouse" listed in the infobox; or don't look at it.  Portions read like it was generated by a large language model, but was posted before large language models became a matter of public concern, and so is just patent nonsense.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Looking at the contribution history of the page creator, it looks like they had multiple edits doing POV pushing on climate change. I have to wonder if they created this hoax article for the purpose of inventing a "reputable" climate change skeptic. –  Stuart 98  ( Talk • Contribs) 22:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article about an imaginary person that contains no fewer than four BLP violations in the infobox, excluding statements about deceased people. If the hoax somehow survives this MfD, the false content about living people should be blanked and redacted from the page history. Glades12 (talk) 06:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.—Alalch E. 15:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, as an obvious nonsense. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 18:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.