Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SpinyRabbit052

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  move to a user subpage and blank per User:SmokeyJoe's excellent, measured suggestion. SpinyRabbit052, please take heed of Joe's comments. Daniel (talk) 04:51, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

User:SpinyRabbit052

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Wikipedia is not a web host for fantasy Cricket 19 tournaments. Whpq (talk) 16:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * But I didn't Find Fixture and Result to make it in Fandom — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpinyRabbit052 (talk • contribs)
 * Wikipedia is not a web host even if you can't figure out how to host your game on another site. -- Whpq (talk) 17:34, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I am not hosting, I just making, not showing this to everyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpinyRabbit052 (talk • contribs)
 * If you are storing it on Wikipedia, then Wikipedia is hosting it regardless of the number of people who look at it. -- Whpq (talk) 21:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I think the number of people who look at it is a useful indicator of actual NOTWEBHOST abuse of Wikipedia. I look at this. It is confused by the page being the user’s main Userpage. SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I disagree. It's hosting content unrelated to the work of developing an encyclopedia regardless of whether it is to entertain oneself, or entertain a group of friends. -- Whpq (talk) 22:17, 20 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - It doesn't really matter what is being fantasy-web-hosted, because Wikipedia is not for web hosting. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Move to a user subpage and blank: It looks like NOTWEBHOSTing for a fantasy game, and Wikipedia has little tolerance for this. Leeway applies, the user has a good number of mainspace contributions, and arguably the content is sandboxing related to their contribution interests, but it is not appropriate for their main Userpage.  Advise them to keep this stuff blanked between uses, to reduce the appearance that it’s purpose is we hosting for some external purpose.  SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.