Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Spittlespat/secret page

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete all but the adoption and userpage pages.. Courcelles 06:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Spittlespat/secret page
Also nominating:

as violations of WP:UP. :| TelCo NaSp  Ve :|  01:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete nearly all The arguments for deleting secret pages are summarized in the essay Why secret pages should be deleted. WP:UP states that examples of unrelated content to writing an encyclopedia are "Games, roleplaying sessions, secret pages and other things pertaining to "entertainment" rather than "writing an encyclopedia". Such activities are generally frowned upon by the community. Facetious games of no educational value relevant to the project are routinely deleted at MfD." WP:NOTMYSPACE states that "[t]he focus of user pages should not be social networking or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration." To the creator: in a July/August 2010 policy discussion (at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Archive 34), community consensus was that the policy What Wikipedia is not does prohibit secret pages. The deletion of this page is not a reflection on you; instead, it is a reflection of the changing community consensus that secret pages set an inappropriate ethos at Wikipedia. In that policy discussion, I wrote here about why all secret pages should be treated equally; whether a user social networks or does not social network on Wikipedia has no bearing on the fact that all secret pages should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe that User:Spittlespat/Userpage and User talk:Spittlespat/adoption are not unacceptable uses of userspace. Cunard (talk) 07:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I believe these were part of a mass MfD which failed - please provide a link to the previous MfD. When the nominatior withdrew that MfD, he promised and RfC on "secret" pages. It seems that he and a collaborator are now going for piecemeal one-by-one MfDs. DuncanHill (talk) 10:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Link to mass MfD. Cunard (talk) 06:33, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Almost all, other than the ones that Cunard pointed out. I agree with Cunard's arguments.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 21:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep: Stop wasting our time. We do not need to purge the project of all the crap that's accumulated. THENEW M O NO   02:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Pages that violate Wikipedia policy (Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Archive 34) ought to be deleted. Cunard (talk) 06:33, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete User:Spittlespat/secret page, User:Spittlespat/secret page2, User:Spittlespat/the awardbox, User:Spittlespat/anthill, User:Spittlespat/games per WP:NOTMYSPACE - not constructive to the project. No specific objections to User talk:Spittlespat/adoption and User:Spittlespat/Userpage, which could be user development pages, for all I know.  Chzz  ► 19:24, 26 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.