Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Stephen LaBerge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted by Zscout370. — xaosflux  Talk  00:56, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

User:Stephen LaBerge
Misleading as there is no such user. Redundant as Stephen LaBerge article contains much more information. I'm nominating the talk page too. Zoz (t) 11:39, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Somebody seems to have mistook the user namespace with the main namespace. Charon X /talk 12:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Interesting. The first draft was created back in 2001.  It was moved to the userspace in 2002 but no user ever appeared to claim it.  The 2004 deletion discussion raised the question but doesn't ever appear to have been closed out.  Time to kill off this non-user page.  Rossami (talk) 13:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redundant, and there's no attached user to claim it.  --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 15:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone above. — Natha  n  ( talk ) 03:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.