Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Stephen Mark Andrew Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted per copyright violation. Chillum 00:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Stephen Mark Andrew Johnson
Inappropriate use of user space. Looks like a direct copy-paste from somewhere without proper attribution. Bringing here as speedy deletion was declined. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete or blank Excessive content unrelated to Wikipedia. Policy(WP:NOT, and copyright issues) is clear on these things. Chillum  01:13, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note. This and above userpage nominations by MZMcBride relate to an active discussion at Wikipedia talk:User page on userpages by non-contributors, and whether they should be speedy-deleted, individually MfDed, blanked, or left alone.  It would be helpful if !voters indicated whether they consider the page suitable for speedy deletion.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Blank, advise user to read Alternative outlets, remove material, and request deletion if he doesn't intend to contibute to wikipedia. Note that this editor occassionally returns.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Blank most - I would suggest that this most of the useage of this userpage is for a crusade and linking to webpages that link to the story. I would suggest blanking all but the first 4 paragraphs - that is reasonable for a userpage - he was last here 8 months ago. --Jordan 1972 (talk) 12:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Blank, advise and later MfD if needed per SmokeyJoe. I also note that user page is a strongly-worded denunciation of NHS -- the author should be advised we're not a soapbox. We actually don't want him to contribute elsewhere if his edits will be non-neutral. The note on the user page should also link to this page so the person sees this action is the community's consensus, not just an arbitrary action. Finally, this user page is about a deep personal tragedy and talk page comments should be carefully and compassionately worded in this case. -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 14:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Blank Non contributors are guaranteed to be non contributors if their very first attempts are speedily deleted without as much as a by-your-leave.   Collect (talk) 14:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The page seems to have been created to use Wikipedia as a soapbox/webhost. The user occasionally "returns" to add more information to the page, not to contribute to Wikipedia in any way. Page also has copyright problems Mr.Z-man 23:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.