Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Stgkirk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete, abuse of Wikipedia as a free webhost.--SB | T 23:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

User:Stgkirk
User page (and talk page, though most recently userpage) appear to be being used by a number of editors with little or no contributions elsewhere to work up some kind of schedule. I popped a polite note on the talk page on December 18th, there was no response and the activity as been ongoing. Delete as a violation of WP:NOT Dina 04:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. "Wikipedia, the free schedule organizer"! -Amarkov blahedits 04:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Planned deletion, I had it written down in my online schedule that I wanted to !vote delete on this at 9:00 UTC. Nonsense userpage, give it the delete hammer. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 09:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I'm not sure what's going on here, but it needs to not be done on WP. Also, you were a minute late, Daniel. -- Kicking222 14:11, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.