Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Studiodan/draft material

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:58, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Studiodan/draft material

 * User:Studiodan

Note: The nominated page contains multiple photographic images of the human penis.

This is "draft material" compiled by an account that has been indefinitely blocked for making comments that had to be oversighted, among other behavioral problems, and who is thus unlikely to return unless they are inclined to evade the block. Consequently, it is of no use to that editor. Nor is it useful for improving a neutral encyclopedia. Note: the main userpage contains this material in the previous history, and the request for that page is to delete that history, not to delete the current revision with the block tag. — Gavia immer (talk) 00:01, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - POV rant trying to disguise itself as an article. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 00:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Admission it is not a draft of an article Clip boards are fine but with this content its extremely questionable merits... also per WP:UP Footnote 2 The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 00:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks like the 2 first-level headers are the names of the articles he intended to insert into (pardon the apparent metaphor) and obviously the second one is a huge rant that would never be allowed in the article. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 00:43, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * At least some of the material had already been rejected from mainspace and was presumably archived to keep the editor's preferred version around; see mainspace addition revert archival. — Gavia immer (talk) 01:02, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, there was some edit-warring going on some weeks back. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 01:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Just a note, your diff Resident actually shows the opposite of what you say it does. He doesn't 'admit it isn't a draft' but says 'that it is'.  That aside...—  Dæ  dαlus Contribs 03:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --John (talk) 03:43, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTBLOG, WP:NOTSOAPBOX, WP:NPOV... basically, all around WP:NOT violation.—  Dæ  dαlus Contribs 03:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * IAR Speedy Let's see... an article in an indef blocked user's space, a block log that references child protection, and a gallery of penises. Umm, delete, oversight, and skip the formality of waiting out this MfD. Sven Manguard  Talk  05:11, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I was especially puzzled by the animated gif. Now, if it were an animated gif of a circumcision, then he'd have something. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 07:32, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * And the illustrations also further the POV-pushing, as he's selected mostly examples where the doctors and/or mohels seem to have botched the job to some degree, while not actually coming out and saying that, thus leaving the visual impression that these are "typical". ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 08:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bugs & Sven. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:43, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I only didn't wang it (sorry) when he started up his nonsense because I couldn't quite come up with a reason for deleting the entire userpage history (and it was my first day on the job), but I can't actually see any reason to keep it. Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Sure, per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 13:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.