Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Subtropical-man/Catfight

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  speedily deleted by  per CSD U1 (user request to delete page in own userspace). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Subtropical-man/Catfight


Moribund archive of long-deleted content in userspace. First of all, as a cut-and-paste archive of deleted content that didn't preserve edit history, it's an overt copyright/CC-licensing violation. Second, given the large numbers of unreferenced claims regarding living persons, it's a massive BLP violation. We went through this last year with the same user at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Subtropical-man/Pornographic actresses; this is just an older instance of the same inappropriate activity that wasn't caught at that time. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 15:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Note to Admin: the notification is out of date, see below.
 * Strong keep, there are no rational arguments to deletion.
 * data about Nude Fight Club and Ultimate Surrender in my plans were to be used to create a collective article of carfight (many catfight brands in one article) because separate articles has been deleted (insufficient notable).
 * I removed this data about these two brand for the sake of peace. At the moment, there is only a table (my work, not from other deleted articles), which does not break any rules - so, the notification is out of date.  Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   15:56, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Even if all of the remaining content is correctly attributed, this remains a moribund draft, without substantive edits for three-and-one-half years, riddled with BLP violations and even more examples of noncompliance with that policy. It probably should be speedied. No page on Wikipedia, no matter which namespace it is located it, should contain unreferenced claims that a notable British female pop singer also makes crappy quasipornographic fetish videos (Ch-rl-tt- K-lly), or that a member of a notable classical music ensemble does the same (Chr-st-n- C-rt-r). A shining example of irresponsible editing that should be expunged as quickly as policy allows. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo), you are the greatest enemy of pornography in Wikipedia, you create AfD pages for many articles, you try delete articles entered speedy delection template, you vote in AfD pages in 99% for delete. Calm down a bit. If in User:Subtropical-man/Catfight there are errors, please correct it, not delete. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   17:30, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom & per NOTWEBHOST, The creator won't ever move this in to article space and even if he does it'll be sent to AFD & subsequently deleted. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note to Admin: - this is not new article, this is table for existing article, as new section. Table will be rewritten and improved. Theory by Davey2010 is totally wrong. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   18:54, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay well this table won't be improved and wont be shoved anywhere! ... Better?, It's been sat here for 3 years and you've not done anything with it since .... So therefore it's extremely unlikely you will ever do anything with it so thus like any other WEBHOST Violation it should be deleted accordingly. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Davey2010, please give quotation from WP:NOTWEBHOST about limits the time to improve page. If such a record does not exist, I have the right to improve the table for even in 5 years. This is table for existing article, as new section. Table will be rewritten and improved... at a convenient time for me. This is page in my space, not article space. I'll decide when I'm gonna fix it, not you. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   19:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * No one shoves a table up here and decides "Hmm I'll continue this in 5 years time!" .... You either sort it out there and then (or even in a few months if you're extremely busy) or it gets deleted, You've had more than enough time to amend and improve it .... You ain't busy 24/7 & 365 days of the year!. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It does not matter how much time, my space is not article space. I'll decide when I'm gonna fix it, not you. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   20:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If it didn't matter "NOTWEBHOST" wouldn't exist would it!, Well you won't be deciding for much longer will you...... – Davey 2010 Talk 20:38, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If there are unfinished tables in the article - ok, correct or delete but user space is not article space. Also, it does not matter how much time, my space is not article space. I'll decide when I'm gonna fix it, not you. No rules of Wikipedia (including WP:NOTWEBHOST) of prohibit create pages in user space and no limits the time to improve page in user space. Simply. You have no right to set of date for fix my page in my user page. In this situation, there is no discussion - if you forced me to improve my page in my user page, I will treat this as harassment. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   20:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not forcing you to do anything but to have something in a sandbox you need to be actively editing it but anyway it's simple - You improve and do something with the table, Or it gets deleted, If you don't wanna improve it then you can wave goodbye to it end of. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:01, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Simply, I wanna improve it, I correct it when I will have more time. You have no right to set of date for fix my page in my user page, so.... discussion is closed. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   21:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * You've had 3 years - That's plenty of time for anyone on here!, Whatever this is getting ridiculous!, "Discussion is closed" ... LOL wow!. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC).


 * Delete as per WP:STALEDRAFT. Moreover, nothing of any notability here. -- P 1 9 9</b> ✉ 13:40, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.