Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SuzanneOlsson/sandbox (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete - if it's actually plausible to make it into a mainspace article (meeting WP:N), ask in Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles, but no evidence has been presented here that working towards the mainspace is the goal, so WP:NOTWEBHOST seems to apply. Wily D 08:57, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

User:SuzanneOlsson/sandbox


Except for an IP today, this hasn't been touched for over 2 years. It's an autobiography of someone who doesn't meet our notability criteria (the user), and we aren't a webhost. Dougweller (talk) 06:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * See also WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Suzanne M. Olsson. I see that the author has edited again today after two years inactivity.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:12, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete both as stale drafts per nom. No reason to keep these pages. -- Klein zach  13:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * '''Note the editor's reason for wanting the page to be kept (on its talk page) ". I really would NOT like this page deleted and see no reason for it to be deleted. From my Stats counter, I can tell that this page is accessed a lot through the years, and often is the only means available for people to locate me and ask questions about the research. It has been an informative and helpful page for many. I would like this page to remain." In other words, she's using us as a webhost - and since she has her own website, the reason for this may simply be related to wanting a biography on Wikipedia. Dougweller (talk) 15:57, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * While the user isn't particularly active, she still has plenty of good-faith edits to the project. She should be worked with to massage this into something that's acceptable as a standard user page: we don't prohibit editors from discussing their work or achievements, nor leaving contact information, on their user pages so long as that isn't their sole reason for being here. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 14:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Good faith is another issue - she was certainly blocked for disruptive editing which included self-promotion. I doubt that she will be back for a while but she is not easy to work with. If she had continued to edit she would almost certainly have ended up with the topic ban that was being discussed. Dougweller (talk) 18:40, 12 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:NOTWEBHOST--Hu12 (talk) 16:41, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOTWEBHOST — raeky  t  05:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.