Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sysages/twinkleoptions.js

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. No consensus to delete. In the absence of any pressing reason for deleting stuff like this (ie it's not filled with abuse or slurs or something), we normally just let it sit, and there's no strong argument that this should be any different. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

User:Sysages/twinkleoptions.js

 * – (View MfD)

Twinkle options subpage over 1 month old for indefinitely blocked and globally locked user account, also see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sysages/Issues and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sysages/sandbox. This subpage was also only edited by the creator. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 15:57, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - We don't crud created by trolls. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * As a matter of principle, WP:DENY and avoiding busywork and leaving SPI and checkuser Stuff to the qualified and authorised, I think that deletion of blocked users’ otherwise innocuous userpages requires the input of at least the blocking admin or a listed SPI clerk.  On the face of it, I do not see a compelling reason to delete, or to trust the user who is unfamiliar to me. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:46, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Do we normally go through the userspace of blocked users and delete automatically-generated Twinkle options pages? This strikes me as rather pointless. – bradv  🍁  16:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * No. I think we get from time to time new people looking for administrative things to do. I think new third party editors seeking to delete blocked users’ userpage amounts to shadow SPI clerking and should be discouraged. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bradv. No point in bringing this page here over any other page of the same nature, and I certainly would not support such an endeavor on a wider scale. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 15:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.