Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:T3Smile/Anthony Chidiac


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. — xaosflux  Talk  14:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

User:T3Smile/Anthony Chidiac
Violation of User page. As there is a article called Anthony Chidiac. nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 20:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Not sure It claims to be an "article in progress", and the history backs up that assertion. Generally, I'm not in favor of writing articles this way: just make your edits incrementally to the real live article, using a "major edit" template if needed. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 14:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weakish Keep - There is a long history here... the user created this sandbox page to keep and work on a deleted article. There is still a lot of information in this article that is awaiting sourcing... I think it's probably useful for the user to keep the sandbox copy around. -- Ben 22:36, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I recently allowed recreation of the article in question. That user could possibly still be using that sandbox as he works on Anthony Chidiac. ^demon[omg plz] 13:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.