Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TJ Spyke/Userboxes/Abortion

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Consensus to delete this one in particular. No consensus on a mass nomination since no other pages were ever tagged - start a new MfD for that, please. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:41, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

User:TJ Spyke/Userboxes/Abortion

 * – (View MfD)

Calls anti-abortion supporters "fanatics" and equates them with terrorists in link. Inflammatory compared to other abortion related boxes. realsanix (Hello!) 16:19, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete inflammatory Userbox. Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 17:01, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as inflammatory. -- a lad insane  (channel two)  19:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Out of curiosity, what other abortion-related userboxes are there? This seems like the sort of topic where Wikipedia wouldn't be served having their users identify their stances, due to the naturally inflammatory nature of the topic.--WaltCip- (talk)  12:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * They're all pretty bad, honestly. Userboxes/Politics/Issues. I honestly can't see, say, User:KC109/Userboxes/Abortion Kills as being the slightest bit better than this one, and honestly would go for a Delete all abortion Userboxes as an appropriate decision, because, honestly, the amount of good they're going to do is so minimal, and they go as far as User:Slightlymad/Userboxes/Anti-abortion, or User:Toa Nidhiki05/Userboxes/Abortion3 - which might not seem so bad, until you realise it's part of a set, and User:Toa Nidhiki05/Userboxes/Abortion2 differs from it by explicitly allowing "abortion" as an indirect part of medical treatments necessary to save the mother's life.
 * WP:UBX bans Useboxes that are divisive, and I really cant see encouraging people to give their hot takes - either side - on one of the most complex and heated moral issues out there will help in the least. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.6% of all FPs 08:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree, and I think we should roll this nomination into a mass deletion of abortion userboxes.--WaltCip- (talk)  14:55, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Shall we? I think that the nominator did find the worst of the anti-abortion boxes, which there are fewe
 * This is going to cause a major discussion so I hope you draft another page for it. The more deletions we have the more we get into the discussion if political userboxes as a whole are needed or not. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 21:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.