Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tali64^2/Square root of 10

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) —  Godsy (TALK CONT ) 07:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Tali64^2/Square root of 10

 * – (View MfD)

Per WP:FAKEARTICLE, the userspace is not for keeping alive content deleted before, namely that of Square root of 10 (AfD). Not sure if this meets G4. Jasper Deng (talk) 07:53, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Do you think that it is interesting that $\sqrt{10}$ and $\sqrt{10|3}$ are equal to $\pi$ and π-1, respectively? I do.Tali64^2, always top quality. (talk) 11:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Interesting. It is ok to keep interesting things in userspace. No serious concern about something thinking it is an article, readers will never find it, but just in case, tag with Userpage. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Not when it is to keep alive a deleted article, deleted by the duly-created consensus of the community, per the linked userpage policy.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:43, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It depends on the reason for deletion. This topic is not inappropriate, just not suitable for an article, not notable. That is not a reason to delete from userspace. This page is within reasonable leeway for the user. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:37, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, a search for possible sources in the Square root of 10 generates a lot of hits. There is an abundance of mentions, and historical connections of sqrt(10) with Pi.  The AfD may not the final word.  I don't see any problem with keeping this userspace note.  There is no offensive or disruptive inappropriate effort to recreate.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Recommend the user or an interested editor to merge and redirect to Approximations of π. No time limit. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:18, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - As User:SmokeyJoe says, the deletion from article space doesn't mean that it needs deleting from user space. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak merge to Approximations of π. That it's not even on that article leads me to believe it is not notable, not like 22/7 or Approximations of pi where they talk about pi = 3 and other government approximations. This is conditional on external news sources that give this some treatment.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - I would have a problem with someone having an article about a previously redirected topic in userspace if it were at all promotional or problematic, but there's absolutely no harm in allowing this user to use their sandboxes this way. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 20:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per the keeps above. Ok for userspace.  — Jeff G. ツ 12:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.