Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tamara787/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Blank. I commented but did not !vote, plus the consensus is pretty clear, so I think my close here is reasonable; if anyone objects feel free to revert me. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:47, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Tamara787/sandbox


unused sandbox, not in english Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:26, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Is there any reason this can't be hit with ? Why does it need to be deleted? &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:49, 19 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Unused? Did you ask the user?  Anyway, "used" is not a requirement of user subpages.  "Not in English" is not relevant.  WMF is a multi-language project.  is a contributor on multiple projects in multiple languages.  en.wikipedia is the leading project, it is natural that many will use it for their base in support of multiple languages, and expunging userpages connecting to other languages has no merit.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:05, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * did you also see that The user in question has been indef blocked as a sockpuppeteer? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:53, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * No. I think the onus is on you to note this if important.  I did check his contributions, and would normally notice a current block, but did not.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * , because, with not-English noted, I quickly went to https://tools.wmflabs.org/guc/?user=Tamara787, from where I perused all global contributions, including en.wikipedia, and this page does not report blocks. The following page does though:  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Tamara787.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd still prefer to just blank. The pre-block edits seem OK, the subpage is connected to them.  Access to these edits may be relevant to someone investigating his mainspace edits, so better to keep the edits available, there not being anything offensive about the contents remaining available in the history.  Sockpuppet investigations/Tamara787 is a good reason to not ask the user.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:08, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Blank you can't really delete a sandbox, so blanking serves the purpose. Legacypac (talk) 11:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see no valid reason for deleting this particular page. The page is in their own user space, although the user is blocked+globally locked, there's no ground for deleting the pages when it doesn't meet any other CSD criteria. -★- PlyrStar93 . → Message me. ← 20:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.