Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tasc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was withdrawn by nominator. John254 22:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Tasc
User:Tasc/monobook.js

User talk:Tasc

User talk:Tasc/Archive1

User talk:Tasc/Archive2

These userpages for an indefinitely blocked user are no longer needed. John254 05:33, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep Just because someone has been indefinitely blocked doesn't mean you whip out their account and user page or user talk page. Such pages should only be deleted if it violates one of Wikipedia's policies regarding user pages and user talk pages. --Farix (Talk) 15:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. There is no basis for deleting these. Tasc was given the opportunity to apologize and return under condition, as far as I know this offer still stands and the request would likely be granted especially if tempers die down. Tasc would need these pages, and other users may need these pages and their page history, regardless. Even if there was no chance of returning, we keep pages like this for recordkeeping and reference (in case someone socks, we need to compare their style to determine this). So, no reason whatsoever for deletion. Why was this even proposed? — coe l acan t a lk  — 20:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.