Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TatiVogue/UserPageIdea1

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. ✗ plicit  13:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

User:TatiVogue/UserPageIdea1

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Blank page by blocked user -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete we do not need to keep. Catfurball (talk) 19:47, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Test.  This is the proper use of userspace. Nomination of blocked users user subpages is busywork tending WP:GRAVEDANCING tending amateur improper clerking of WP:SPI. If any blocked user’s subpages need deletion for reason associated with the block, that’s for the blocking admin or someone SPI qualified to say so.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - This was a test in userspace, which is a valid use of userspace, but then the user blanked it, which is an implied U1, user request. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:46, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Blanking in userspace does not imply U1. In userspace, blanking is often used for archiving, and so blanking must not be interpreted as u1 by others. As a test, blanking allows the user to review their test at will.  Mainspace blanking implies g7, this may be the source of confusion. SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:57, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, there's no implied U1 as there is for G7.—Alalch E. 15:58, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. No grounds to delete.—Alalch E. 15:59, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.