Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tautologist/Palin's Church (uncensored)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. This consensus does not apply to User:Tautologist/WAoG_in_progress as it hasn't been discussed. Tikiwont (talk) 08:10, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Tautologist/Palin's Church (uncensored)
This is a copy of Wasilla Assembly of God that User:Tautologist (currently blocked for sockpuppetry and editwarring on a BLP) maintains with all the assorted POV assertions that have been removed by other editors as BLP violations. They include a set of non-RS'ed allegations attempting to link Sarah Palin to perceived religious extremists, including Thomas Muthee. Per Biographies_of_living_persons, this is impermissable. User:L'Aquatique declined speedy and referred me here -- Jclemens (talk) 03:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV forks of articles in userspace are not allowed.  --UsaSatsui (talk) 12:05, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- I didn't feel a speedy was justified at the time, however I do believe the material should be deleted. While it isn't libelous per sé, there's really not a whole lot of point in keeping it around when it is obviously never going to end up on the main WAG page because of BLP concerns. Just because something is in user space does not mean give the writer full control over it. ~  L'Aquatique   [  talk  ] 17:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV forks in userspace are inappropriate - especially where there are BLP concerns. Keeping such a page almost amounts to a speediable attack page, but not close enough to warrant its speedying. Grutness...wha?  23:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * delete per all above. JoshuaZ (talk) 19:25, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd also like to add User:Tautologist/WAoG_in_progress to the request. It has many of the same issues less the blatant title, is linked from User:Tautologist, and has no particular value should Tautologist desire to edit Wasilla Assembly of God again now that his block has expired, since the consensus version has moved in a radically different direction. Jclemens (talk) 18:45, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.