Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Taylorwalls

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Taylorwalls


Userpage of indef-blocked user is a mess, hard to even tell what they were going for. Home Lander (talk) 01:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Just blank. Use userpage blanked or inactive userpage blanked.  Possibly move to a subpage and blank.  Not worth MfD.  You can clean without holding these meetings.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sometimes things need deleting, and this is one. Dump dump dump on the nominators.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. If you don't want to review MfD nominations don't comment on them. Legacypac (talk) 09:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I want to review MfD to protect quiet infrequent users from being bullied by busybodies. This one is pretty weak, borderline worthless contributions.  Delete now that we are here, but it is counter productive to run a forum on every worthless page of every low value volunteer.  The user is blocked.  Blank their silly pages, and no one need every again spend a second looking at them. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * [a] There's no bullying. [b] You're not protecting the "quiet infrequent" user: the reason he's infrequent is that he's indef-blocked. [c] As Legacypac said, if you think it's counterproductive, don't feel the need to comment: see WP:NOTCOMPULSORY. Amisom (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Amison, I didn’t mean to imply bulling or protection at play in this case, but sometimes at mfd. Having reviewed this case, I recommending blanking as the most appropriate response, instead of mfding.  No objection to “delete now that we are here”.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as it serves no puropse. Amisom (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Gave me a needed laugh, particularly with: "Heartsless Name Rony Heartsless", but yeah, this is just completely incomprehensible nonesense 💵Money💵emoji💵 💸 21:03, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.