Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tb240904/Andrew Byrne (paedophile)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:56, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Tb240904/Andrew Byrne (paedophile)
Possible G10 attack page in violation of WP:CRYSTAL mechamind  9  0  17:21, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * A quick Google News archives search produced news coverage that indicates this is not a G10:, , , . So this seems to be a legitimate draft. --RL0919 (talk) 17:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete though it doesn't meet G10 having BLP minefields such as this one lying around as undeveloped drafts in userspace is a very bad idea. The creator hasn't touched it in over a year and hasn't edited in four months. Hut 8.5 21:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete As an article this has hundreds of issues per talk page, some of which aren't solvable (notabilty), it's unlikely to survive in the mainspace. User does not seem interested in improving the article or solving these issues. In its current form its obviously a massive BLP violation and being in draft form in userspace does not completely exclude it from WP's BLP policy. I would add as well that user hasn't taken interest in the page at all since it was userfied. Bob House 884 (talk) 16:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Although this doesn't meet G10 or CRYSTAL for deletion, the draft content buried in the history is a massive BLP violation and minefield, and a user untrodden one. If the user ever decides to rewrite to policy standards, they can drop a request. Delete per WP:BLP, and Hut 8.5 & Bob House. We should not leave something toxic like this around, even in the history. Good catch to the nom. — Becksguy (talk) 20:35, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * In the case of CRYSTAL, a prior version included the words "and is likely to". mechamind  9  0  05:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.