Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Teacher2167/Glenfield Public School




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep  Triplestop   x3  03:13, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

User:Teacher2167/Glenfield Public School
Promotional article about a school. &rArr; Pickboth manlol   00:04, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - in the current form it's hopelessly POV and probably COI. Nevertheless the editor appears to still be working on it. Perhaps this is a case where guidance could be offered with a view to producing a usuable article. Crafty (talk) 00:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Work in progress on a user sub page WP:AGF Jeepday (talk) 00:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - sandboxy and per Craftyminion. Tag with noindex and worry about it if it gets mainspaced. Would suggest a speedy closure per do not bite the newcomers. –xenotalk 00:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Tagged as suggested. Crafty (talk) 00:17, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - Its a workpage on a possibly notable topic, we should aid our new members not bite them. - Marcusmax  ( speak ) 00:12, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep the article is currently hopeless, miserable, and all the above ("On Friday we go to Seddon Park. If it is raining, we just do school sports, and if it’s to hot, we just stay at school." haha), but the school exists, and could gain notability.  TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 00:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep This is userspace we are dealing with. POV is generally found in userspace to be sure, and is not against any guideline as long as it does not cause disrepute to WP etc. Nor is notability required in userspace. If and when the user wishes to move it to mainspace, then some of these issues might be relevant, but until then without a reason to delete, default to keep. Collect (talk) 00:40, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep A work in progress and a perfectly legitimate use of userspace. I concur with the suggestion that this MfD should be speedily closed due to the bitey nomination. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 01:53, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per all above and most likely everyone below. And, not to be crass or rude, but do you not have anything better to do than nominate things for deletion? I believe this is the fourth or fifth one that I have seen from you in the past few days. There's nothing wrong with desiring to assist with deletion of obviously inappropriate and unencyclopedic content, but most of your nominations are either snow keeps or fall under the criteria for speedy deletion. Just my two cents and I meant no offence by it, so please don't take it personally. Just something to ponder. @Kate   (talk)  02:45, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep the key words about this page are "in progress" so why aren't you helping them to clean it up? Miami33139 (talk) 03:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.