Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Techie3/onemanonewoman

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete per G4 from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/onemanonewoman 4th nomination. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

User:Techie3/onemanonewoman

 * – (View MfD)



Frankly, it's a joke that DAYS after we had a discussion, ending in deleting dozens of similar userboxes, new ones are coming up - and G4 speedydelete is being refused by the admin who recreated the box for his own use, on the grounds that THIS one - just like the ones that were deleted - hasn't been before.

We literally just HAD this debate. It had dozens of people vote (somewhere around 50 by a very rough count). Why is this happening again? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.5% of all FPs 06:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Polemical, disruptive, divisive, preachy, and, despite claim to the contrary, hateful. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 06:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hard to see how WP:G4 was not accurate/appropriate/correct.. Looks spot on to me. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 06:51, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. There was a very clear WP:CONSENSUS in that well-attended MFD. Narky Blert (talk) 06:50, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.