Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TeleComNasSprVen/PMD

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. -- Cirt (talk) 04:39, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

User:TeleComNasSprVen/PMD
Serves no apparent useful purpose. Seems to be obscure, personal musings of some sort. Hasn't been edited in more than a month. Given the current craze for deleting extraneous stuff in userspace it seems appropriate to nominate this for the same. MtD (talk) 22:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * See his talkpage. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  00:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep Pointless, but I don't see anything wrong with it. Access Denied  [FATAL ERROR]  04:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC) Now that I realise that it's a motto page (with a humorous redlink) I vote strong keep'.  Access Denied  [FATAL ERROR]  00:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep wrote in the above diff: "To clear up any confusion you might have had, I want to say three things. First, the page was meant to be a proposed motto of the day, and I wanted feedback on it, and that's why I publicize it on my userpage as well as in my sig." The content on the page being debated is: "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. When all the dust and smoke have cleared" This page's purpose involves improving Wikipedia and does not violate any policies or guidelines. Because this page is acceptable per User pages (WP:UP#YES) (Current or planned articles, topic areas, to-do lists, reminders, articles worked on, accolades and other successes, collaborative works, draft proposals, (constructive) thoughts on Wikipedia articles or policies and how they should be changed, etc.)&mdash;mine emphasized&mdash;it should be kept. Cunard (talk) 07:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks to me like this is just a proposal for MotD. I see absolutely no problem with it.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 21:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. This nomination looks a bit WP:POINTy to me and the content of the page is perfectly acceptable under WP:UPYES. Salvio  Let's talk 'bout it! 19:39, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm aware of no policy that recommends the deletion of pages simply because they're unused. The last sentence of the nomination makes me wonder how much you really believe in this.  —  Soap  —  22:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.