Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Teneuesbooks/teNeues




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep and move to main space at teNeues per DGG, after de-peacocking and adding a ref. JohnCD (talk) 15:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Teneuesbooks/teNeues
Clearly an ad, clearly created by a User with an interest in the subject matter. And yet, my db-ad tag was removed solely because it's in User space. When did User space become an acceptable location for advertising? Woogee (talk) 06:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If you look at the userspace page, see the tag immediately below the MFD tag; userspace drafts are permitted a far wider range of problems than text anywhere else. Nyttend (talk) 13:30, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete anyway because I don't think userspace should be given such leeway. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * We have never allowed spam in user space, why should we be starting now? Woogee (talk) 21:38, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Weakish Delete - Normally, I wouldn't mind, having a userspace draft is permissible, but the user has an apparent WP:COI. User is also blocked for COI and can't edit the page. If it becomes clear the user doesn't have a COI and changes username, it can be re-created, but I don't think that's likely to happen, Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  16:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * move to mainspace they;re a notable fine arts publishing house & refs are available. I'm prepared to take responsibility for the article   DGG ( talk ) 16:10, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG. Appears notable.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The text suggests that the subject is notable, and since an established editor is willing to take over the content and move it to mainspace, I think we should allow that process to proceed. --RL0919 (talk) 16:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.