Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Terryeo/Scientology article corrections


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete all. Tikiwont (talk) 09:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

User:Terryeo/Scientology article corrections

 * User:Terryeo/Scientology article corrections
 * User:Terryeo/subpage1
 * User talk:Terryeo/subpage1

No need to retain subpage of this indef-blocked user. See also block log, and Requests_for_arbitration/Terryeo. Cirt (talk) 22:01, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: Also added User:Terryeo/subpage1. Cirt (talk) 22:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * (ec)Delete - and add all other subpages in userspace: User:Terryeo/subpage1, User talk:Terryeo/subpage1. // roux   22:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅. Cirt (talk) 22:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment is there a policy that banned users pages or subpages are deleted? It does seem to happen quite often. In this cases the pages themselves are OK, being about altering wikipedia, even if that don't match my POV. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:53, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Ban and WP:NOT apply. Cirt (talk) 06:34, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. They appear to be pages that support POV editing. Since the user is indef blocked, we don't need to retain them and keeping them could only lead to the harmful effect of someone using them.0- Mgm|(talk) 15:18, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per excellent statement above by Mgm. John Carter (talk) 18:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.