Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tetsumonchi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. ( Radiant ) 16:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

User:Tetsumonchi
See What can I not have on my user page?, page does not present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia →WP:NOT. User has almost no contributions other than this page (his contributions). Page was originaly deleted: here, 15 April 2006. User was warned about his page. Philip  Gronowski  Contribs  02:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. One (1) image upload seems to be his entire contribution here. This isn't MySpace Light. --Calton | Talk 05:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 06:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, including non-encyclopedic images. - Mgm|(talk) 11:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not MySpace. - Mailer Diablo 16:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete despite user blanking the page and talk page, still delete. Need contributors, not people looking for MySpace. (Pages unblanked.) —Doug Bell talk 07:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Changing to conditional keep given the user's statement of cooperation with the user page policies, and conditional upon said cooperation. —Doug Bell talk 01:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I've blocked Tetsumonchi for 24 hours for blanking the user page after being warned not to blank it again. —Doug Bell talk 17:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I think deleting the page may be somewhat extreme. I mean, if the issue here is the page content, then the obvious course of action, in my mind, would be to remove anything from the user page that was causing concern and replace it with detail relevant to that user's activities Wikipedia. Personally, I'd be more than happy to cooperate with Wiki on this, given the chance. Deleting the page is always an option, but I am concerned that it may be unnecessarily harsh - especially if the user is openly willing cooperate to find another solution. Delete the page if you wish, but what can be dealt with by deleting a page can just as easily be dealt with by editing the page. 81.101.155.97 00:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC) The preceeding comment was made by Tetsumonchi editing as an anonymous IP since User:Tetsumonchi was currently blocked.  Since he has agree to be cooperative and quit being disruptive, I have unblocked the account (said block being due to expire in a couple of hours anyway). —Doug Bell talk 00:57, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete User is using wikipedia as a personal webhost.02:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * keep The user has productive edits in mainspace and the user has decided to cooperate with WP:USER. Let the user trim things down to a more standard userpage. JoshuaZ 05:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.