Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tfleming111/Sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

User:Tfleming111/Sandbox


WP:FAKEARTICLE about fringe physics theory invented by Wikipedia user and self-published. Abandoned years ago and account has no other contributions. jni (delete)...just not interested 17:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

No this description of the theory is untrue; it was not 'self-published'; it was published by Pan Stanford Publishing; the only reason I didn't work on the page was due to negative feedback from some other users; There are now two books on this topic, I am happy to do the work if it were to be published as part of wikipedia Tfleming111Tfleming111 (talk) 21:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

I don't understand what your descriptor {WP:FAKEARTICLE} is all about; this is definitely NOT a 'fakearticle'; explain what you are talking about; better still read something about the content before you go trampling around someone's work "'If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery.'"
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a means of promoting or legitimizing fringe theories. MER-C 07:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mr Fleming, you wrote on your user page "Wikipedia should be a good way to spread the news of this breakthrough." No, sorry, that is not what an encyclopedia is for. One of Wikipedia's fundamental policies is No original research, which includes:
 * The reference WP:FAKEARTICLE is to part of the User page policy, which says that "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles..." JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.