Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ThaddeusB/Celebriducks

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep. — ξ xplicit  00:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

User:ThaddeusB/Celebriducks
This has been in userspace for over a year now with absolutely no edits since its userfication. With the super thin sourcing I don't see it surviving as an article. Also, ThaddeusB appears to be semi-retired as he's made almost no edits since May. Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. User posted only six weeks ago or so indicating his intentions to resume editing. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep As noted, user is not deceased from WP. No real need to delete. Collect (talk) 13:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Close I have done some minor cleanup on the page and have moved it to CelebriDucks. Sources such as this article from USA Today and this article from Fortune Small Business demonstrate that this company is notable. Cunard (talk) 21:12, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.