Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheAuthorWikiGuy/Kristy Dempsey

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. Salvio 18:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

User:TheAuthorWikiGuy/Kristy Dempsey

 * – (Vtiew MfD)

In 2015, this was moved to userspace as a user requested alternative to deletion (Articles for deletion/Kristy Dempsey). Hasn't been touched since, and they're not notable, so never going to become an actual article. Wikipedia is not an indefinite holding space, so this should be deleted- only reason it was moved to userspace was a request from a COI user to do so rather than delete Joseph2302 (talk) 12:44, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:G13. 🐔 Chicdat Chicken Database 12:50, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * G13 does not apply as this was not in draft sp[ace and was never submitted to AfC. Has anyone looked to see if there is additional coverage of this author since 2015? The draft as written does not establish notability, but wouldn't be an A7 if in mainspace either. This person might in fact be notable now. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 13:24, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Had a look, and can't see anything suggesting notability, which is why I nominated it. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:27, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I have found some reveiws from majhor review sites, which i am adding to the draft. These might actually be enough to pass WP:NAUTHOR. In any case I think that they lift this above the MfD threshold. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:16, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as per improvements. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I have significantly expanded and improved this draft. In my view it currently passes WP:NAUTHOR and not only should not be deleted, it is ready for the main article space. No COI editing remains. 18 sources are cited, mostly for book reviews in reliable, often quite well-known, publications. Only twoi cites are to pages of the subject's web site, for basic non-controversial facts. I ask you to look at the revised draft and reconsider your views in light of the changes made. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:22, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per DES &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 14:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.