Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheBigSpoon/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. I am not as generous as Beebs I suppose, of the several reasons that this page could be deleted, U5 it is (as an activity not closely related to Wikipedia's goals). kelapstick(bainuu) 23:38, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

User:TheBigSpoon/sandbox


This page was listed as a speedy, as vandalism, by User:L3X1. In the context of 's overall contributions, I concurred, and deleted the page under G1 (patent nonsense). User:MPS1992 objected to the deletion on my talk page, and pointed out that, technically, G1 does not apply to user sandboxes or other pages in user space. I have undeleted the page out of respect for User:MPS1992's request, removed the speedy tag, and listed it here out of respect for User:L3X1's good-faith addition of the speedy tag. I do not believe that the page serves any useful purpose. Some might construe other CSD to apply (G3, G5, U5), but I prefer to list here for broader input. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:28, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Seriously, a debate over whether to keep this? Only on Wikipedia. KJP1 (talk) 22:39, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Multiple times I have seen the sandboxes full of gibberish created by indeffed VOAs and socks deleted under G3, so I thought that the CSD would not be out of line. (page search "sandbox: CSD G3" on my CSD log for some examples. I won't link any because I cannot remember their contents to any great degree º\_(-^-)_/º. I would disagree with  on G5, as I have heard many times that the To qualify, the edit or article must have been made while the user was actually banned or blocked. A page created before the ban or block was imposed or after it was lifted will not qualify under this criterion. section would invalidate it, as BigSpoon was NOTHEREd rather than sock-blocked. More input on the applicability of G5 is welcome. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  23:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete C’mon. UninvitedCompany, you are being too nice here. WP:IAR is plenty of justification to remove a garbage page created by a vandal. How is Wikipedia harmed by removing this junk? How is it helped by restoring it and having this pointless debate. I’m halfway tempted to just re-speedy it myself. (G5, however does not apply here. The user must be a sock for that to work.) Beeblebrox (talk) 23:18, 2 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.