Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheListUpdater/Altamonte Mall

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. --RL0919 (talk) 03:06, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

User:TheListUpdater/Altamonte Mall
WP:STALEDRAFT. Altamonte Mall was created in November 2006 by, a SPA apparently affiliated with General Growth Properties who spammed Wikipedia with articles/links on various malls by that company and thus got blocked. KFP moved it into TheListUpdater's userspace in April 2007; TLU tweaked it for a while but abandoned it soon afterward. Another user created a legit, sourced article at Altamonte Mall in 2009, so the draft is now obsolete. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep and blank since the user is still active. That's what I normally do with my old drafts and sandbox pages. Sometimes I get ideas from something I worked on before and want to look back at what was said or formatted or referenced, etc. -- Ned Scott 09:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That's not what WP:STALEDRAFT says to do though. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:57, 8 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Abandoned WP:FAKEARTICLE, which hasn't been edited in over three years: Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 18:29, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, which states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 00:33, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I did abandon it several years back, and am okay with deletion. TheListUpdater (talk) 01:41, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.