Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheListUpdater/New articles

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 13:21, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

User:TheListUpdater/New articles


Unlinked list of unclear purpose. Not linked from anywhere, not maintained. ListUpdater is pretty much retired. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:37, 15 May 2012 (UTC) 
 * Keep User:TheListUpdater/New articles seems to be a list of articles that wishes to create. I reviewed several of the red links on the page and they were not to deleted articles but to ones yet to be created. Per User pages: "Notes related to your Wikipedia work and activities 'Current or planned articles, topic areas, to-do lists, reminders, articles worked on, accolades and other successes, collaborative works, draft proposals, (constructive) thoughts on Wikipedia articles or policies and how they should be changed, etc.'" I believe this material should be retained. Cunard (talk) 02:59, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio  Let's talk about it! 16:42, 26 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per Cunard, harmless. Graham 87 14:02, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per User pages and Cunard. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Editors should find better things to do than police userspace. --Surturz (talk) 12:42, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.