Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Youri Raffi Djorkaeff

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. Talk to me if you want to perform a merge. --BDD (talk) 21:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Youri Raffi Djorkaeff


Hasn't been updated by User since 15 June 2013‎. Requesting deletion per WP:STALEDRAFT JMHamo (talk) 01:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 *  Keep Merge per WP:NODEADLINE and it has been submitted to AfC for review. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 02:10, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I forgot to say that Youri Djorkaeff already exists in the Main space since September 2004, so this draft is not needed. JMHamo (talk) 02:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox/Youri Raffi Djorkaeff is much more extensive and the extra useful information should be merged into the current article. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 12:50, 16 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete This draft may be more extensive than the current article but it is mostly unreferenced, written in odd mixed tenses and is poor English such as "Perfectly melted the heart of this new culture and what he discovered soccer, he even encourages former neo-retired players to join him, including his former teammate at Paris Saint-Germain Pascal Nouma or his friend Christophe Dugarry in vainbiblio 22." A major job to get anything from this. Better to edit the current article.--Egghead06 (talk) 04:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * However, there is "some" useful, referenced new content, and that should be merged into the article and not just deleted. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 12:50, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * What do you think should be merged from this draft? Just curious... JMHamo (talk) 12:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm sure there are many things, let's start with: "Through his mother's family, he is of Armenian descent and is descended from Armenian Genocide survivors.[4][5][6]"... That is the first sourced thing that should be merged. Since this would need to be hist-merged to retain proper credit, I'm just going to leave it at that and let an admin deal with it and decide for themselves what should be kept. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 13:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment – the user is topic banned from Armenian-related articles, this explains why the topic-related edits are in userspace. If the suggestion here is to use TheShadowCrow's Armenia-related edits and merge them into the article, isn't it a case of circumventing the ban? It would appear he wants to keep the drafts in user space until he successfully appeals his ban, which will be at least another six months. C679 17:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - Based on 's comment, would this be eligible for CSD G5? JMHamo (talk) 18:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The whole content of the sandbox stems from, including this break-off page. I'm not 100% sure, but it would appear he has been topic banned since at least 17 December 2012 according to the block log. C679 18:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * These sandboxes were an exception to the ban. You can find evidence of this on my talk page during this period of time. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 12:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - nothing worth merging with the existing article. GiantSnowman 18:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Uber-inclusionists have had 1½ year to merge allegedly salvageable content from this topic-banned user's WP:STALEDRAFT POV-fork already. It has not happened so far, and will likely never happen. jni (delete)...just not interested 08:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * While it's true that the draft has been around a long time, it's unlikely that anyone noticed it in a user's sandbox. However, it's getting plenty of publicity now, and has been announced at Wikiproject Football, so it should either be merged or deleted right away, and not kept any longer in its current condition.  &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 16:21, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment – this is a break-off from User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox, although the information is identical. made this page to reduce the size of the original sandbox, but the user restored all the material there anyway, resulting in this waste of space duplication. See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox (2nd nomination). C679  10:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.