Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox (3rd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

User:TheShadowCrow/sandbox


This userpage is very large (~512KB) and is full of old drafts which have not been worked on in quite some time. broke out many of the drafts during the first MfD, but restored them on two occasions, specifically  and, though his last constructive edit to the drafts was on , before his reversions of Technical 13's efforts, and his last overall edit was on May 10, 2014.

Long story short, WP:STALEDRAFT. — Jkudlick t c s 14:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


 * NOTE - I am not presently requesting consideration of any subpages of the sandbox for deletion, only the sandbox itself. — Jkudlick t c s 14:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Nuke this monster. In the small chance that there's interest in any of the subpages for content that was previously created here, the sandbox can have a null edit and the content restored and moved (probably for the best anyways). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - No benefit to the project. Delete as Stale Draft. JMHamo (talk) 15:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Blank, not delete - This is an option per WP:STALEDRAFT. I want to make use of this sandbox's content. We can just blank the page and add a template, that way the large amount of bytes won't effect the search engine and the page history will still exist for future use. --Steverci (talk) 19:37, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Blank - if anyone has the energy, remove the stuff that is now live first. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:49, 8 November 2015 (UTC).


 * ✅ Let's close this nomination as solved then. --Steverci (talk) 02:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I've reverted you. Please wait for the outcome of this MfD and an Admin will make the necessary changes. JMHamo (talk) 02:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.