Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The Cunctator/Samuel Hook

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Userpage draft deleted by the user -  technical close only by the nominator - Youreallycan (talk) 15:18, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

User:The Cunctator/Samuel Hook


Userfied prod diff - unedited in over five months -no evidence that the subject will ever be notable for this one event -  when I came across it today, it was imo a userfied  attack stub about a not notable living person with content supported by a single primary external and had been exposed to search engine results for over five months. Youreallycan (talk) 00:22, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * This is not part of the Wikipedia namespace. It is well sourced, accurate material that contributes to an extremely newsworthy and encyclopedic subject that I and others spent tremendous man-hours researching (the Abramoff scandal). It is not an "attack stub." I believe Youreallycan may be trying to harass me for an argument over at Talk:Demi Moore. --The Cunctator (talk) 00:33, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment The cite given has in all of its myriad pages (373) only a very short mention of Hook ("Also, according to Short, two of Abramoff’s associates, Shana Tesler and Samuel Hook, did not work all those hours for which Greenberg Traurig billed its clients." is basically the entire content relating to Samuel Hook in the text, and the rest is in footnotes ascribing the claims to being made by a single person, and not as a conclusion of the report), and does not support the claims made. WP:BLP applies to userspace drafts, and thus this material, as it is not supported by a reliable source, is directly contrary to Wikipedia policy.  Drafts are absolutely allowed in userspace, but the WP:BLP violations must be removed.   Cheers. Collect (talk) 04:19, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * This needs to be properly sourced or removed per WP:BLP. Hut 8.5 12:42, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.