Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The Homosexualist/U/thugguns

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

User:The Homosexualist/U/thugguns


Offensive by comparing nazis and islamic terrorists to right wing people. This serves no purpose on Wikipedia - it is purely a political statement with no connection to building the encyclopdia. Legacypac (talk) 19:45, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:POLEMIC. Unnecessarily divisive/provocative and unrelated to Wikipedia. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 20:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'll quote an argument I made at User:Apollonius 1236/userboxes/Gun control Totalitarian: limiting the use of firearms to right-wing terrorists specifically is not reflective of an actual political argument … Nor does specifying "right-wing thugs" accomplish anything useful, because "left-wing" and "Islamic" terrorists also use (and presumably "love") firearms. This userbox is, in my view, an association fallacy, because it goes out of its way to associate guns with right-wing extremism when there is no logical benefit to doing so over any other tpye of extremism (or extremism in general). —Compassionate727 (T·C) 21:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ... so delete this one, but keep the one with pictures of Hitler and KKK members because that one isn't a problem for WP:POLEMIC? I'm having trouble following this logic. Regardless of the logic of its argument, in what way is this more divisive along the lines of WP:POLEMIC? &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 21:57, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Given the general vagueness of this question, I'll assume you didn't read my comments on that discussion. If you have a specific question about one of my claims, I'd be more than happy to answer that. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Noting the above, two wrongs don't make a right. Get rid of them both.  Robert McClenon (talk) 21:50, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as the opposition is politically charged as well, thus violating neutrality. Evidence being that similar userboxes have been placed about the left-wing without the same reaction. -User:Учхљёная (talk,philosophy,edits). 04:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC).
 * the existance of left wing boxes is not an excuse. I'll nominate them for deletion too if you point them out. My nomination has nothing to do with my political views. Legacypac (talk) 10:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete yeah per above Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:41, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete due to the polemic nature of the sentiment which cannot help form consensus among editors. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.