Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The Ian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete per consensus  Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  17:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

User:The Ian
Vanity user page created in July 2006; user's only significant contribution. User hasn't edited since. Wikipedia is not MySpace. —Bkell (talk) 05:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete And its not like people are even going to look at this page. Me   what do u want?  Your Hancock Please
 * What I mean is this: What is the point of having a vanity or biography if no one is going to look at it? If this editor doesn't have any contributions, why would anybody be on his page? Me   what do u want?  Your Hancock Please  20:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - After all, it's not like people are even going to look at this page.--WaltCip (talk) 14:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - with the user long gone and no useful content here, it seems like a clear waste of Wiki-space. Terraxos (talk) 01:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Erm, deleted material stays in the archives, so deleting it doesn't free up any "Wiki-space". Plus, we're not supposed to worry about space anyway. Just clearing up a common misconception about why we delete pages. WaltonOne 11:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as vanity/spam. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. Macy (Review me!) 21:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm surprised this never ended up in the mainspace also. Paragon12321 (talk) 03:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - abuse of Wikipedia as a social networking site. The images on this page, Image:Iangreen.jpg and Image:Games.JPG, should also be deleted. MER-C 04:16, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Although it is a rather entertaining read, the user doesn't appear to be active and he seems to have misunderstood Wikipedia userpace as some sort of a blog. Lazulilasher (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.