Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The MP/Fast Dial

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. No prejudice against draftification.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 17:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

User:The MP/Fast Dial

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

WP:FAKEARTICLE created in 2011 and untouched since 2012. Previously existed at Fast Dial, which was deleted in 2008 by WP:PROD. Wikipedia is not a webhost. ✗ plicit  13:12, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify - This looks like it might be a valid article, but it hasn't been reviewed, and I am not offering an opinion on notability or verifiability. If no one pays any attention to it in six months, the bit bucket is thataway.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:54, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Consider undeleting the article and history-merge with the Userpage. It was merely an expired prod, and was userfied by copy-paste. All users have always been welcome to Userfy a prodded article, they are even welcome to Userfy a consensus-deleted article, which this is not.  In userspace, there are no deadlines, like for draftspace, for good and well considered reasons. Do not Draftify, there is nothing wrong with this old article that warrants deletion, even slow G13 deletion.  Do not assume the author is not coming back, that is a rude self-fulfilling professy. The negatives of policing of others’ userspace outweight the zero benefit cleaning others’ userspace. If someone thinks this Userpage is worthless or less than worthless, which I do not, then blank with Userpage blanked. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Zero pageviews in 90 days] refutes the allegation of WEBHOSTing. The page was obviously intended as a project contribution. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:09, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as a stalled fakearticle. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 06:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * It is not a FAKEARTICLE, and any confusion is clarified by the userpage tag.
 * It is, actually, a WP:STALEDRAFT#2, “let it be”.
 * —- SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:12, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per SmokeyJoe. Page sits peacefully in userspace and does not create any credible concerns, such as the stated web hosting concern. —Alalch E. 00:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.