Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb/Userboxes/NoLikeTheBomb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Inflammatory, divisive, and created by a blocked user.  bibliomaniac 1  5  02:39, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

User:The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb/Userboxes/NoLikeTheBomb
Highly divisive userbox, inflammatory also.   Asenine   12:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Looks like a joke to me. Mr.Z-man 17:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Joke or not, it is inflammatory and keeping it would give a rather bad idea of what we promote at Wikipedia - which is certainly not this public hatred of editors.   Ase ' nine ' '' 18:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You've got to be kidding me. You do realize it is about "hating" the editor who created it right? I don't find this inflammatory in the least. We're no longer allowed to use the word "hate?" When did Wikipedia become the thought police? Mr.Z-man 19:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The userbox is not vocal about who created it. If someone sees this on someone's page they are more likely to think that it is acceptable in general than not.   Ase ' nine ' '' 20:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Moderate keep I can't imagine anyone thinking that this isn't a joke. Bart133 t c @ How's my driving? 02:49, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep- stupid but harmless. Reyk  YO!  05:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless the block on the originator is lifted, this has to go. -- Angus   Deay  ton  ( ~ ) 11:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, user has been indef blocked (see Requests for checkuser/Case/The Twenty Thousand Tonne Bomb) and all user subpages deleted except these two currently being discussed. --Stormie (talk) 11:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Angus and Stormie. The "harmless" argument doesn't hold as much weight when the user is indef-blocked; if by some chance s/he should be unblocked at some time in the future, the pages can be restored without too much hassle. –Black Falcon (Talk) 16:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - This user has now been indefinitely blocked, so his entire userspace should probably be deleted. VegaDark (talk) 15:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.