Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Thehelpinghand/Brownism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

User:Thehelpinghand/Brownism
User who created this is now indefinitely blocked for, among other things, incompetence. This had not been edited in the month prior to the block anyway, and we do have an article on Brownism. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:28, 15 August 2010 (UTC) *Very Weak Keep The user is blocked, but obviously and annoyingly continuing to contest his block. What's the record for unblock requests anyway? Deleting the user subpage is probably not a big deal and I assume the block will become de facto permanent, but this feels too soon for me. Let's let the dust settle a bit before deleting their stuff. Matt Deres (talk) 22:10, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. It clearly isn't ever going to be any use to the project. Brownism itself is a worrying article title. I am British and I hardly ever heard the phrase used. Brownite (which redirects to it) was used almost exclusively. There seems to be other more notable claims on the term "Brownism". I'd say it looks like it needs a move or a merge. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Eh, you're probably right. Deletion it is. Matt Deres (talk) 00:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:FAKEARTICLE is enough without the block. This hadn't been edited in the month before the block, and we do have a real article on the subject. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:12, 15 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, which states "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content or indefinitely archive permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a free web host and private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion" (mine emphasized). Because this userpage draft violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, and because the userpage draft is unsourced whereas Brownism is developed and sourced, User:Thehelpinghand/Brownism should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 22:42, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. When I first encountered Thehelpinghand I helped him by userfying this for him so that he may work on it. He chose to completely abandon it and work on something else instead, he hasn't edited it since. Nothing is going to happen with this article, he's not going to improve it, and it certainly isn't going to replace the current article, it's just going to sit here, and since we're not a free web host it must be deleted. -- &oelig; &trade; 01:14, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per OlEnglish, who knows what he's talking about. Jusdafax  17:09, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.