Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Theindianicon

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was relist at AfD. Since the author has moved it to the mainspace, it is now to be assessed as an article - see Articles for deletion/Ankur Tiwari. I have (reluctantly) decided that it does not qualify for speedy deletion under WP:CSD JohnCD (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

User:Theindianicon


Article being held in a userpage rather than the mainspace Amortias (T)(C) 18:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:FAKEARTICLE and an almost certain A7 if it's moved to article space. He's 19 and discovered a way of dividing by zero that everyone else seems to have missed, and he's invented a new super computer. The patent application is real - but I don't know if it's been granted, or whether they can understand it better than I can. Pat app is not notable. Pat granted isn't either. Peridon (talk) 21:18, 27 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. -- Whpq (talk) 11:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Article: http://www.bhaskar.com/article/c-16-665295-NOR.html Theindianicon — Preceding undated comment added 15:50, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Dont Delete The page should not be deleted because the matter is of educational importance. The largest newspaper group of India, (Dainik Bhaskar, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dainik_Bhaskar) had covered it. The article is in Hindi so, please use Google translator or other similar tool.
 * Comment - The page under consideration is a user page and not an article. User pages are not allowed to look like articles, nor is it to be used as a substitute for an article.  As with Peridon above, I'm not convinced the individual meets Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines, but there is at least one source noted above.  If the intent is that this is to be an article, then I suggest that it could be moved to draft space, or placed in the user sandbox. -- Whpq (talk) 09:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Article is having many appropriate sources, therefore, please move it to draft space -- Theindianicon — Preceding undated comment added 02:51, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Please Move to Draft Space*


 * Speedy delete The user page has been moved to article space Ankur Tiwari and the subject is clearly a non-notable person deletable WP:A7. I am One of Many (talk) 17:41, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete If someone had invalidated current mathematics then I think there would be an abundance of reliable sources on the subject. I call either BS or the author of the theory does not get something about math that makes him think he is right. Chillum 20:29, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.