Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheoryMaster


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Hmwith brings up a good point. Wholesale deletion of the page does not seem needed as no particular policy violations were raised. If user returns, reversion is much more simple than undeletion. IronGargoyle 22:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

User:TheoryMaster
It appears to me this does not met user page standars. After twice nominating it for speedy deletion, the speedy deletion tag was removed. Also, according to, the author admits he made up the article but his user page says the theory is real. Just keep in mind that when you click the external link, you have to click the posted comments link (at the bottom of the page) to see the author of the hoax admiting he created a hoax. That's false information, huh? Wikipedia is not the place for false information so this should be deleted. I want to see how this goes here. Oscar ford 13:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Seems to have been removed.DGG 20:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * What was removed? --Oscar ford 21:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep I agree with other users that advocating the inclusion of a hoax on Wikipedia is harmless, as long as such fantasies remain fantasies. I just don't see why we should cause unnecessary misery to this user. Shalom Hello 05:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The user isn't active, so why can't we just delete the page?  According to the external link, the author even admits he made up a hoax?  Why can't we just get false information out of the way?  Again, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a blog, nor a place for false stuff.  --Oscar ford 17:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not an actual editor. If and when he becomes one, he can re-create it. --Calton | Talk 00:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete first section. No reason to delete the whole page. Let him have a quick link to his favorite picture. hmwith  talk  21:28, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Wikipedia is not a collection of images. The whole entire article should be deleted.--Oscar ford 22:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If the editor really likes the image, he can simply copy and paste the picture to a word document.  It doesn't need to be here.--Oscar ford 19:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * keep no userspace vio as far as I can tell.-- Sef rin gle Talk 16:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.