Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete all. — xaosflux  Talk 02:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own


Like, this troll seems to feed off having their sockpuppets tagged, as I've frequently seem them ask for their accounts to be tagged, and I think they should be given the same WP:DENY treatment as Supreme Genghis Khan by having this page, the corresponding user talk page and the userpages of their sockpuppets deleted. Linguist 111 Moi?  Moi.  09:07, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Mixed It has both positives and negatives:

Positive: This troll might stop making more sockpuppets.

Negative: We won't have the ability to track how many sockpuppets this user has created.

That's my thoughts.--Whispy Woods (talk) 12:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)


 * And semi-protect the LTA page too, since we dont want him vandalizing it and needing to state it on the page. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  15:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't think an LTA page is justified for this moron, just RBI, rinse and repeat. The tagged socks should stay, but we should preferably refrain from tagging more. Also, these guys love SPI attention, so just use AIV for a faster and more discreet response. GABgab 15:46, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I think we should do a LTA page this jerk has has vandalized for a long time. There is a ban discussion at WP:ANI and you can reply there. I would not delete it. Just create the LTA and semi protect it so this idiot doesn't vandalize he should get one trust me he vandalized for a long time. --74.138.121.153 (talk) 19:06, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Have to agree with what GeneralizationsAreBad said. I think we should simply leave the older sockpuppet userpages alone. RBI and reporting to AIV seems to be working just fine. Also, is a long-term abuse page really necessary for this (fairly well known) vandal? Tikeem gets a kick out of socktags and the SPI page, so I fear creating the LTA would only be giving them what they want. Sro23 (talk) 20:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all, salt any LTA page, and disregard all sockpuppets in this MfD. WP:DENY should be applied to users such as this. -- zzuuzz (talk) 03:53, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all: per WP:DENY. Semi-protect his LTA page to prevent being vandalized, no matter this troll gets. KGirlTrucker81talk what I'm been doing 10:43, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Strong delete all userspace pages, rename attack usernames and deny recognition. There is absolutely no need to keep track on whatever socks this chit is churning out lately. As per my rationale on the SGK MfD page, tagging only feeds the troll, and Linguist 111 was right about the consequences of leaving a paper trail over him. Blake Gripling (talk) 11:23, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'll start preparing an LTA page, if that's okay with everyone. Linguist 111  Moi?  Moi.  11:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I oppose that proposal. It gives this person the kind of recognition he craves and doesn't really add any value. Favonian (talk) 11:48, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * What he does is blatant and flagrant anyway. An LTA page for a troll like him would be superfluous when 'tis just the matter of RBIng any of his socks. Blake Gripling (talk) 11:53, 22 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete all and do not make an LTA page. BethNaught (talk) 11:50, 22 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment see CU comments at Sockpuppet investigations/AntiSemiTruckFan106 that this and several other prolific socks are all the same person - Incorigible Troll. Nthep (talk) 16:37, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I was under the impression that AntiSemiTruckFan106 = Incorrigible Troll, who just used the names of other sockmasters (like SGK). ("...the 'master' is Incorrigible Troll... these are all the aforementioned Troll.") Am I missing something?GABgab 14:08, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * SGK, Tikeem etc are all Incorrigible Troll so creating separate LTAs is pointless. The only person we have to deny is IT. Nthep (talk) 14:53, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, that's news to me - wow. GABgab 14:55, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I had a feeling Genghis Khan and Tikeem were the same person... Linguist 111  Moi?  Moi.  15:10, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Strike my last, serves me right for trying to make sense of something when I have flu and am feeling lightheaded. Nthep (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.