Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Timberhawkgear


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 16:16, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Timberhawkgear
Slightly less blatant that most spam, at least it's properly wikified, most likely a leftover draft from the identical main namespace article. I'll leave it up to others to descide if the company is notable enough to rewrite and salvage the main namespace article, but this is still basicaly an advertisement in the user namespace and should be deleted regardles of the fate of it's main namespace counterpart. --Sherool (talk) 09:50, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Redundant to Timber Hawk. Made by a user who has made no other contributions except to these two pages and whose only edits were on 4 July 2006.  It's a misuse of the userspace.  Delete the userpage and nominate the article-space version for failure to meet the recommended inclusion criteria at WP:CORP.   Rossami (talk) 14:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Rossami. 1ne 23:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.