Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Timeshift9 (3rd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Speedy keep, since no one else apparently has the balls to close this. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:09, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

User:Timeshift9 (3rd nomination)


MfDs for this user page:  I am raising this MfD on behalf of who as an IP is unable to create the MfD page. The reason given is: "UP and WP:SOAP". JohnCD (talk) 16:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


 * What has changed since the last nomination a year ago? It's been ruled time and time again that as long as it's not pages and pages of text, it is ok. And i've always been willing to address any particular concerns people may have. Timeshift (talk) 00:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep bad-faith MfD from SPA attack sock. JohnCD should be trouted for encouraging this. --Surturz (talk) 02:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see the problem with this user page. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:19, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep A user is entitled to their opinion, even non-wiki related opinions. Ego White Tray (talk) 00:31, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Wasn't this nomination deleted yesterday? Surturz is right, this is a pointless attack from a user who does not even identify them-self. JohnCD says they are "an IP is unable to create the MfD page". Why do you think they are unable to create an account to do that? Is it because they already have an account and are unwilling to stand up and say they are the one nominating, or is it because the nominator is a banned user (like Welshboyau perhaps?) who has had the right to create accounts taken away from them? Timeshift's user page is quite modest in size and no more topical in content than it was at the end of the last MfD so going through this process is just wasting everyone's time to please an anonymous attack sock. There is nothing wrong with Timeshift's user page. NPOV in articles, free speech on user pages. Now let's please get back to the work that matters - editing.   Djapa Owen (talk) 00:33, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Snow keep - this sh*t again? Didn't happen the first two times; not going to happen now. Which of the many vandals against whom Timeshift has fought would like to claim credit for the IP? I can short-list a couple. Should be snow-closed but with our thanks to JohnCD for doing the bureaucratic thing. Stalwart 111  02:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.