Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tinucherian/Indians WP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW KEEP - That said, I might suggest that the page is brought in line with other such project pages, listing Wikipedians as WikiProject India participants (current and possibly potential, as noted in the comments below), rather than just saying that this is a list of Wikipedians of a certain descent. (If only to prevent further noms such as this one...) - jc37 20:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Tinucherian/Indians WP (Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Indians WP)
Inappropriate page. We don't have Wikipedians from US or of US orgin. On Wiki your nationality is unimportant. It is a meaningless excersise. The gen-X (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose: Pointy and bad faith MFD nom . Associated with WP:INDIA WikiProject to identify users contributing to India related content ( plz note that it also give major users that are interested in India related content and not only of Indian orgin). Al --  Tinu  Cherian  - 08:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose The US Wikipedians/any other wikiproject not having chosen not to have such a page is a ludicrous reason for deleting this. The page is a part of the collaboration process. Nationalities are quite immaterial, nonetheless, a lot of collaboration and networking on WP happens through such bonds/associations, which is why we have so many wikiprojects. prashanthns (talk) 09:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Fully proper in userspace, no reason for deletion. As for identifying nationality, if we wish to stop all such, we would need to eliminate a host of userboxes as well.  You are welcome to propose them all for deletion, of course. Collect (talk) 13:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strongest ever Keep Bad faith nom. As per other Keep comments. --SkyWalker (talk) 14:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.