Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Trakaplex

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete. Daniel (talk) 18:50, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

User:Trakaplex

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

User page being used as a blog or fansite. WP:NOTWEBHOST. Matt Deres (talk) 02:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Although this user is not being actively disruptive to the project, they have not made a single edit in article space and appear to be WP:NOTHERE. I believe the appropriate response here is to direct them to some WP:ALTERNATIVEOUTLETS (I would personally suggest Neocities). silvia  (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)  (inquire within)  02:25, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Seems he already has a blog. —Tamfang (talk) 00:11, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Trakaplex BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 02:26, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Do you mean me? Trakaplex doesn't seem to have yet commented on their userpage being potentially deleted. silvia  (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)  (inquire within)  02:29, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am sorry because of that mistake. Of course I mean you. I obviously don't expect that Trakaplex will support the drive to delete their own userpage. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 21:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UP. 151.210.133.57 (talk) 03:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Alexcalamaro (talk) 14:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. I asked Trakaplex whether the individuals discussed in his "story" are real people, but he has not edited since I posted the question. If the references are to identifiable living people, the page contains very substantial BLP violations. Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:33, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per NOTWEBHOST. Wouldn't be appropriate on a subpage, and even less so on main userpage. Meters (talk) 01:34, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above -- Lenticel ( talk ) 04:37, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Could be U5 but we are here. Probably contains numerous BLP violations.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:25, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Tagged for speedy. After looking more closely, I observed that in my initial cursory perusal of the page, I'd missed that Trakaplex's YouTube channel and other offsite pages were listed at the bottom. This page is plainly self-promotional upon close inspection, and didn't need a discussion to begin with. silvia  (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4)  (inquire within)  18:39, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.