Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Trampton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep.  Daniel.Bryant  05:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Trampton
Seems to think Wikipedia is his personal blog. In his userpage, he writes that the page is his.
 * (context omitted from excerpt, revealed links as text in case people don't hover --Random832 18:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)) ["Favorites" questions with User:Trampton] "websites are: [ http://www.imdb.com/], [ http://www.yahoo.com/] , [ http://www.google.com/] , [ http://kvil.com/pages/80484.php]], [ http://www.tv.com/], [ http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Main_Page] and of course,here,at Wikipedia!"

Request deletion, and a recreate to suit the policies of WP:USER. --K.Z      Talk  •   Vandal   •  Contrib  06:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Seems to be fixed so i see no more reason for deletion--K.Z      Talk  •   Vandal   •  Contrib  04:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Re-read it. He's saying that those sites are his favorite sites. That's all. Koweja 00:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep active editor with decent article contributions. Nothing offensive or inappropriate on the user page itself; also per Koweja. (And for once no cute pastel boxes anywhere!) Awyong J. M. Salleh 01:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I can't find anything on here that's worthy of deletion. He could use some lessons on seperating paragraphs, but bad writing isn't a reason for deletion. -- TomXP411[Talk] 02:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep -- You must have just taken a quick look at the page without actually reading it carefully. Doesn't seem at all like a blog.  Eugene  2x  Sign here  ☺   03:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment He seemed to have fixed the problem now, but did you read the userpage before I tagged it? --K.Z       Talk  •   Vandal   •  Contrib  05:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * that version still says that it's one of his favorite websites, not "his" website. --Random832 18:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:NOT. Telly   addict Editor review! 12:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:NOT? More like WP:PERNOM - didn't even bother to verify that he interpreted the page correctly. --Random832 18:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * note - comments above this point may be from before clarification was added to the excerpt. --Random832 18:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * speedy keep as misunderstanding; see my comment above --Random832 18:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, either through nominator withdraw or WP:SNOW. Grace notes T  &#167; 00:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. I don't have the feeling that it's a blog more than a userpage.  OhanaUnited   01:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. bd2412  T 02:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.