Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Triadian/Userboxes/Global Warming Exaggerated

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) Tol  (talk &#124; contribs) @ 20:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

User:Triadian/Userboxes/Global Warming Exaggerated

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

At this point there is a strong scientific consensus that anthropogenic climate change is a real, serious threat and global warming denialism is up there with anti-vax and Qanon as a destructive conspiracy theory. This might’ve gotten a pass back in 2007 but it’s high time we deleted this. Dronebogus (talk) 13:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep because:
 * It isn't a conspiracy theory. It is a difference of scientific opinion.  Climate change denial is an error.  The belief that global warming is exaggerated is within the scope of ongoing scientific discussion.
 * Qanon is a destructive conspiracy theory. This isn't comparable to Qanon.
 * Some anti-vax is due to conspiracy theories. Some is due to stupidity.  This isn't comparable to anti-vax.
 * Having found a few harmful rags, the nominator is continuing the rag picking. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. A reasonable position.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep same reasons that said and it’s just a personnel opinion that someone makes based off their own research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ Kaleeb18  (talk • contribs) 17:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.