Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Truthseek77/This Is The Public Domain

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. Mike V • Talk 19:26, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Truthseek77/This Is The Public Domain


Copyright infringement of the linked site, but maybe they don't care. Advertising though. Not notable - more like a thought experiment and effort to ditch a worthless chunk of dirt, maybe to avoid paying property taxes on it. If not deleted, should be merged and redirected to Amy Balkin Legacypac (talk) 05:00, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Acceptable userspace brainstorming. MfD cannot compel a merge and redirect to a mainspace article, instead, the nominator should propose a merge and redirect on the article's talk page.  Keep, unless something thinks it is promotion, and in that case replace with Inactive userpage blanked.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:17, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Per Ricky below, this was a draft preceding the copy-paste creation of This is the Public Domain. The easiest fix is to redirect to the article (simulating the redirect that would exist if a proper WP:Move had been done instead of the undesirable copy-paste.  A history merge would completely simulate the result, but is administrative overkill.  Deletion in favour of the mainspace article also is administrative overkill.  Disappointing that the nominator did not locate the mainspace article under the same title.  I guess we need a WP:BEFORE for MfD?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is a non-history-merged draft later created at This is the Public Domain. It's a single editor so there's no need for a merger. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing yet suggesting an acceptable article. SwisterTwister   talk  06:31, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * User:SwisterTwister, you you mean to say that This is the Public Domain does not even suggest an acceptable article? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.